Is it worth it to mount a processor MediaTek rather than Qualcomm?

Up to this time Huawei and Samsung are two of the only firms that produce their own processors internal on a regular basis. The rest of the device manufacturers Android or the great majority come to MediaTek and Qualcomm for the processors in their mobile devices.

These two manufacturers of processors have dominated the market for several years and everything seems to indicate that this will not change in the short term.

The CPU of Qualcomm and MediaTek

Both firms use the cores of ARM. ARM is a company that manufactures cores for a processor. However, there is a difference between Qualcomm and MediaTek.

Qualcomm also has its own nuclei Kryo, with designs semi-custom (dubbed Kryo Gold or Kryo Silver). These designs are based on CPU cores-standard ARM, with some adjustments to the power consumption and performance. Qualcomm uses the best cores ARM nothing more to leave the market, as is the case with the new Snapdragon 675.

Qualcomm improves core, ARM, and MediaTek not

MediaTek uses CPU cores without modifying. For his part, MediaTek is a little more reserved and has not yet used the last cores (ARM Cortex-A76, A75 and A55).

Both use the same cores, but Qualcomm better and riding faster. Since the company have more resources, and it charges a lot more for their processors.

What processors perform better in games?

The GPU, or graphics card, are the biggest advantage of the processors Qualcomm, thanks your secret technology graphics Adreno. This is due to the acquisition by Qualcomm the business of graphic chips out of the hand of AMD (Adreno is an anagram of Radeon, the brand of graphics of AMD).

GPU Adreno exceeded recently, the GPU Mali ARM in several points of reference. Although the new GPU Mali-G76 ARM is a great upgrade, in theory, addressed to a superior performance. We are confident that Qualcomm not to be left behind, so we look forward to the coming announcements of chips emblematic of the company in December of the same year with the Snapdragon 8150.

developer Support and updates

If you want to install a new ROM in your mobile, Qualcomm has always been the better option. Phones MediaTek earned a bad reputation years ago, so it took a long time to release the source code.

The MediaTek are known to be updated less, why?

But it’s not always their fault, sometimes the brand of mobile is not updated. That’s why they have launched the initiative GMS Express more than a year ago, which requires having a version of Android more up-to-date if you put a MediaTek.

initiative Project Treble Google should also serve to give update faster to any mobile, regardless of the hardware, but for the moment, is not being so. MediaTek is not a lost cause for the updates, but Qualcomm remains the best option for updates.

Devices Qualcomm and MediaTek

it Is common to see processors MediaTek in mobile low range. Phones such as the Nokia 1, Nokia 3.1 and Redmi 6 and 6A the mount. In fact, the new chips Helium A22 and P22 of the low range of the company are smaller than those from Qualcomm, which should result in a better autonomy on the paper.

, Qualcomm is still using chips former in this range as the Snapdragon 212 and the Snapdragon 425 for this range. Qualcomm has released new versions of these, but hardly used because of their high cost in comparison with MediaTek.

MediaTek dominates in the low range, and fight in the middle

The Qualcomm mid-range are a little more powerful. The series Snapdragon 600 and 700 Qualcomm outweigh the mid-range MediaTek, currently the Helium P60 and MT6750.

The most popular phones with Helium P60 and MT6750 are the Nokia 5.1 Plus, Oppo F9, LG Q7 and LG X Power 2. In the mid-range Qualcomm find some superior as the Nokia 7 Plus, the Xiaomi Mi A2 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5. For the most part, the chips Snapdragon tend to be preferred by the most important firms.

Qualcomm hits the high range, surely!

In the high-end, there is no discussion. The series Snapdragon 800 from Qualcomm is the chosen one for all, with the exception of Samsung and Huawei who also ride their own processors. MediaTek has been taking a break after its failed foray with the Helium X30 last year, which reached only to the Meizu Pro 7 Plus. Will it return with a Helium X40? Here you talk about it.

So what is better? What Qualcomm or MediaTek?

at The time of purchasing a mobile chip that you use is not the only thing that we must observe. There are many features that we compare. But Qualcomm is always going to perform better in the high range.

on the other hand, if you’re looking for something mid-range is a little more complicated, because the Helium P60 MediaTek and the popular Snapdragon 660 Qualcomm yield even. However, the new mid-range Qualcomm is still more powerful. We leave it to your choice.

MediaTek dominates in the low range, and competes in the middle

If you go down to the low-end devices MediaTek has advantage, thanks to the series Helium A22 and P22. The offer newer chips and smaller than the low range of Qualcomm. In terms of money, the mobile MediaTek tend to be cheaper, and that is a plus point. what do You prefer?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!